Another religious marital rape apologist?

Hot topics in delusion and rationalization.
the_ignored
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 8:05 am
Location: Right where I'm not supposed to be.
Has thanked: 71 times
Been thanked: 20 times

Another religious marital rape apologist?

Post by the_ignored » Tue Jul 14, 2015 12:18 am

Anyone remember creationist marital rape apologist John Mackay?
http://www.fstdt.com/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=100664

Guess what?
Oh yeah. This is worse.
It depends. Had he just had sex with her in the last few days? Then perhaps he should have put her need to not experience more pain and discomfort ahead of his need for sex. But if she had been in pain for weeks or a month and he finally came to her and said “Babe I need this, I promise I will make it quick” – then she should have put his need for sex above her need to not experience additional discomfort.

Sometimes though a woman cannot have vaginal intercourse for medical reasons beyond just discomfort.

And it gets worse:
As I have said before, I have never advocated for a Christian husband to force himself upon his wife. But contrary to what feminists and other marital rape accusers say – there is difference between a husband convincing his wife to let him have sex with her and him physically forcing himself upon her.

Rather than hash this out again here – I have answered this entire issue from a Biblical perspective in the my article “Is a husband selfish for having sex with his wife when she is not in the mood”. But the short answer is no he is not being selfish for having sex with his wife simply because she is not in the mood. The Bible is clear that for the purposes of sex “The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife.” – I Corinthians 7:4.
>From: enuffenuff@fastmail.fm
(excerpt follows):
>Good luck with that fuckwit. And Reynold, fucking run, and don't stop.
>Disappear would be best as it was you who dared to attack me on my
>illness knowing nothing of the cause. You disgust me and you are top of
>the list boy. Again, no violence. Just regular reminders of who's there
>and visits to see you are behaving. Nothing scary in reality. But I'd
>still disappear if I was you.

User avatar
sparks
Posts: 13455
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: Friar McWallclocks Bar -- Where time stands still while you lean over!
Has thanked: 1659 times
Been thanked: 532 times

Re: Another religious marital rape apologist?

Post by sparks » Wed Jul 15, 2015 12:52 am

We are................................yes, you know it.






Fucking doomed!
You can lead them to knowledge, but you can't make them think.

User avatar
Abdul Alhazred
Posts: 69412
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:33 pm
Title: Yes, that one.
Location: Chicago
Has thanked: 2777 times
Been thanked: 1066 times

Re: Another religious marital rape apologist?

Post by Abdul Alhazred » Wed Jul 15, 2015 1:07 am

Some dope on the internet?

Slick looking website and all that, but likely a masturbation fantasy not a lifestyle.

Sincere as far as it goes, I suppose.
Image "If I turn in a sicko, will I get a reward?"

"Yes! A BIG REWARD!" ====> Click here to turn in a sicko
Any man writes a mission statement spends a night in the box.
-- our mission statement plappendale

the_ignored
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 8:05 am
Location: Right where I'm not supposed to be.
Has thanked: 71 times
Been thanked: 20 times

Re: Another religious marital rape apologist?

Post by the_ignored » Wed Jul 15, 2015 11:32 pm

True...but there are people like that first guy, John Mackay, who have an actual organization behind them, and they publish books, give speeches, and attack the character of real scientists and teachers. I figure: Expose them whenever possible. Let people know what those people are really like and maybe, just maybe, we can stem their poison at least a little bit.
>From: enuffenuff@fastmail.fm
(excerpt follows):
>Good luck with that fuckwit. And Reynold, fucking run, and don't stop.
>Disappear would be best as it was you who dared to attack me on my
>illness knowing nothing of the cause. You disgust me and you are top of
>the list boy. Again, no violence. Just regular reminders of who's there
>and visits to see you are behaving. Nothing scary in reality. But I'd
>still disappear if I was you.