Those 7 year old boys were just sluts, see?

Hot topics in delusion and rationalization.
User avatar
Abdul Alhazred
Posts: 70808
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:33 pm
Title: Yes, that one.
Location: Chicago
Has thanked: 3171 times
Been thanked: 1174 times

Those 7 year old boys were just sluts, see?

Post by Abdul Alhazred » Fri Feb 26, 2016 5:47 pm

If they don't mean it that way, what do they mean?

NY Bishop Rape Shames Abuse Victims: Boys Are ‘Culpable’ For Their Actions At 7 Years Old
Church and State Press

I don't have a problem with the notion that a 7 year old can have moral responsibility. But that really is not the point now is it?
Bishop Robert Cunningham of the diocese of Syracuse, NY doesn’t think priests should take all of the blame for decades, if not centuries, of sexual abuse against young boys. According to Cunningham, the “age of reason” in the Catholic church is seven, so those boys are culpable for their actions. ...
The same line of reasoning could be applied to adult women, right? Or adult men, come to think of it.
Image "If I turn in a sicko, will I get a reward?"

"Yes! A BIG REWARD!" ====> Click here to turn in a sicko
Any man writes a mission statement spends a night in the box.
-- our mission statement plappendale

User avatar
sparks
Posts: 14009
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: Friar McWallclocks Bar -- Where time stands still while you lean over!
Has thanked: 1919 times
Been thanked: 593 times

Re: Those 7 year old boys were just sluts, see?

Post by sparks » Fri Feb 26, 2016 8:49 pm

Age of reason does not equal age of consent.

The Bishop is a Cunt. So is the RCC.
You can lead them to knowledge, but you can't make them think.