DOES the college lecture discriminate? Is it biased against undergraduates who are not white, male and affluent?
The notion may seem absurd on its face. The lecture is an old and well-established tradition in education. To most of us, it simply is the way college courses are taught. Even online courses are largely conventional lectures uploaded to the web.
Yet a growing body of evidence suggests that the lecture is not generic or neutral, but a specific cultural form that favors some people while discriminating against others, including women, minorities and low-income and first-generation college students. This is not a matter of instructor bias; it is the lecture format itself — when used on its own without other instructional supports — that offers unfair advantages to an already privileged population.
How can we expose more people to critical thinking?
2 posts • Page 1 of 1
- Posts: 19398
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
- Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan
- Has thanked: 1145 times
- Been thanked: 897 times
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/09/13/op ... erer=&_r=0
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.
- Posts: 66394
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:33 pm
- Title: Yes, that one.
- Location: Chicago
- Has thanked: 2041 times
- Been thanked: 870 times
an old and well-established tradition in education
No fucking excuse. Indeed, evidence for the prosecution modulo some extenuating circumstance.
Hey! They took the analogy test out of the SAT for less.
Any man writes a mission statement spends a night in the box.
-- our mission statement plappendale
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: CCBot [Bot] and 0 guests