EU courts don't need science when ruling on science

We are the Borg.
User avatar
Grammatron
Posts: 33459
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 1:21 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Been thanked: 1717 times

EU courts don't need science when ruling on science

Post by Grammatron » Wed Jun 21, 2017 11:05 pm

http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/21/health/va ... index.html
The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled Wednesday that courts may consider vaccines to be the cause of an illness, even in the absence of scientific evidence confirming a link.

The EU's highest court said that if the development of a disease is timely to the person's receiving a vaccine, if the person was previously health with a lack of history of the disease in their family and if a significant number of disease cases are reported among people receiving a certain vaccine, this may serve as enough proof.

The ruling stemmed from the case of a French man known as J.W. who was vaccinated against hepatitis B in 1998 and developed multiple sclerosis a year later. Multiple sclerosis is a neurological disorder in which the body's own immune system attacks the brain and spinal cord. The disease scars nerve tissue and causes a range of symptoms, from vision problems to paralysis. J.W. died in 2011.

In 2006, J.W. sued pharmaceutical company Sanofi Pasteur, which produced the vaccine, blaming it for his decline in health.

The case was brought before the Court of Appeal in France, which ruled that there was no scientific consensus supporting a causal link and no evidence of a causal link between the hepatitis B vaccine and the man's multiple sclerosis, therefore dismissing the action.

This judgment was appealed and brought to the French Court of Cessation, which took it to the European Court of Justice.

The Court of Justice said that "specific and consistent evidence" relating to timeliness, a prior healthy status, lack of family history and multiple cases may prove to be enough, according to a statement. J.W.'s case referred to the first three criteria.

User avatar
Abdul Alhazred
Posts: 70772
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:33 pm
Title: Yes, that one.
Location: Chicago
Has thanked: 3167 times
Been thanked: 1170 times

Re: EU courts don't need science when ruling on science

Post by Abdul Alhazred » Wed Jun 21, 2017 11:32 pm

Why should the USA have a monopoly on anti-science politics?

Go Europe! :cowbell:
Image "If I turn in a sicko, will I get a reward?"

"Yes! A BIG REWARD!" ====> Click here to turn in a sicko
Any man writes a mission statement spends a night in the box.
-- our mission statement plappendale

User avatar
Witness
Posts: 16446
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm
Has thanked: 1993 times
Been thanked: 2722 times

Re: EU courts don't need science when ruling on science

Post by Witness » Thu Jun 22, 2017 2:22 am

I hear witchcraft has a long and well-documented track record… :mrgreen:

User avatar
sparks
Posts: 13995
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: Friar McWallclocks Bar -- Where time stands still while you lean over!
Has thanked: 1910 times
Been thanked: 592 times

Re: EU courts don't need science when ruling on science

Post by sparks » Thu Jun 22, 2017 2:29 am

Certainly efficient at ending obnoxious old women, thereby parting them from their wealth.
You can lead them to knowledge, but you can't make them think.