Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Lies, damned lies, and statistics.
User avatar
specious_reasons
Posts: 6694
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 7:58 pm
Has thanked: 37 times
Been thanked: 28 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby specious_reasons » Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:27 pm

ed wrote:A more basic question is the extent of federal power. Why do they need to own 75% of a state? n.b. "Need" is always on the lips of gun rights deniers so I thought that I'd try it on for size, for yuks you understand :)


There are legitimate questions about federal overreach, and then there are standoffs between the government and ignorant ranchers who fail to pay their legal debts to the government.

Sometimes the issues even overlap, causing people to rally around criminals who don't deserve the assistance they get.
ta-
DAVE!!!

User avatar
hammegk
Posts: 15134
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 1:16 pm
Title: Curmudgeon
Location: Hither, sometimes Yon
Has thanked: 386 times
Been thanked: 28 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby hammegk » Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:29 pm

Pick cotton in lieu of welfare. Lol.

User avatar
Rob Lister
Posts: 19044
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 7:15 pm
Title: Incipient toppler
Location: Hiding under ed's bed
Has thanked: 491 times
Been thanked: 489 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby Rob Lister » Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:47 pm

ed wrote:A more basic question is the extent of federal power. Why do they need to own 75% of a state?


My above post was too glib. Lincoln wasn't really a foward thinker.

The better question is, what does Nevada need with 25% of a Federally acquired territory.

Spoiler:
Image


So the U.S. stole it fair and square.

Nevadans. Pfft.

I swear, give them an inch ...

Hell, they're lucky they got Reno.

User avatar
Nyarlathotep
Posts: 46428
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 2:50 pm
Has thanked: 698 times
Been thanked: 1156 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby Nyarlathotep » Fri Apr 25, 2014 2:02 pm

ed wrote:A more basic question is the extent of federal power. Why do they need to own 84% of a state? n.b. "Need" is always on the lips of gun rights deniers so I thought that I'd try it on for size, for yuks you understand :)


Fixed it for you because I actually looked it up rather than going off of memory. I understated it. 84% is the current total.
All Hail The Crimson King

User avatar
ed
Posts: 30988
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:52 pm
Title: Rhino of the Florida swamps
Has thanked: 361 times
Been thanked: 598 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby ed » Fri Apr 25, 2014 2:17 pm

specious_reasons wrote:
ed wrote:A more basic question is the extent of federal power. Why do they need to own 75% of a state? n.b. "Need" is always on the lips of gun rights deniers so I thought that I'd try it on for size, for yuks you understand :)


There are legitimate questions about federal overreach, and then there are standoffs between the government and ignorant ranchers who fail to pay their legal debts to the government.

Sometimes the issues even overlap, causing people to rally around criminals who don't deserve the assistance they get.


true. But like a paranoid delusion, if you accept the basic premise then the whole thing makes sense.

Question is: what right do they have to "own" 70% of Nevada?
- new minimalist ethos -

User avatar
Abdul Alhazred
Posts: 66386
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:33 pm
Title: Yes, that one.
Location: Chicago
Has thanked: 2041 times
Been thanked: 870 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby Abdul Alhazred » Fri Apr 25, 2014 2:27 pm

Anaxagoras wrote:They were enforcing a court order. That's "due process".


It is not due process, even if a court does it.

He was not convicted of a crime.
Image "If I turn in a sicko, will I get a reward?"

"Yes! A BIG REWARD!" ====> Click here to turn in a sicko
Any man writes a mission statement spends a night in the box.
-- our mission statement plappendale

User avatar
Abdul Alhazred
Posts: 66386
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:33 pm
Title: Yes, that one.
Location: Chicago
Has thanked: 2041 times
Been thanked: 870 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby Abdul Alhazred » Fri Apr 25, 2014 2:30 pm

hammegk wrote:Pick cotton in lieu of welfare. Lol.


A machine can pick a field of cotton, quicker than you can jump down spin around. :cowbell:
Image "If I turn in a sicko, will I get a reward?"

"Yes! A BIG REWARD!" ====> Click here to turn in a sicko
Any man writes a mission statement spends a night in the box.
-- our mission statement plappendale

User avatar
Anaxagoras
Posts: 19388
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan
Has thanked: 1144 times
Been thanked: 897 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby Anaxagoras » Fri Apr 25, 2014 2:37 pm

Abdul Alhazred wrote:
Anaxagoras wrote:They were enforcing a court order. That's "due process".


It is not due process, even if a court does it.

He was not convicted of a crime.


Nonsense.
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.
William Shakespeare

User avatar
ed
Posts: 30988
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:52 pm
Title: Rhino of the Florida swamps
Has thanked: 361 times
Been thanked: 598 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby ed » Fri Apr 25, 2014 3:01 pm

Anaxagoras wrote:
Abdul Alhazred wrote:
Anaxagoras wrote:They were enforcing a court order. That's "due process".


It is not due process, even if a court does it.

He was not convicted of a crime.


Nonsense.


He lost his case ages ago. I think that was his due process. The problems here are more basic, I think.
- new minimalist ethos -

User avatar
hammegk
Posts: 15134
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 1:16 pm
Title: Curmudgeon
Location: Hither, sometimes Yon
Has thanked: 386 times
Been thanked: 28 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby hammegk » Fri Apr 25, 2014 7:41 pm

Abdul Alhazred wrote:
hammegk wrote:Pick cotton in lieu of welfare. Lol.


A machine can pick a field of cotton, quicker than you can jump down spin around. :cowbell:

Maybe it needs welfare to work slower.

User avatar
Nyarlathotep
Posts: 46428
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 2:50 pm
Has thanked: 698 times
Been thanked: 1156 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby Nyarlathotep » Fri Apr 25, 2014 7:52 pm

Turns out that, were he alive today, Martin Luther King would be on Mr. Bundy's side. Just ask him

Bundy: If people are ‘offensive’ by what I say, ‘Martin Luther King hasn’t got his job done yet’

I thought about Rosa Park taking her seat at the front of the bus. Reverend Martin Luther King did not want her to take her seat in the front of the bus. That wasn’t what he was talking about. He did not say go to the front of the bus and that’s where your seat was. What Reverend King wanted was that she could sit anywhere in the bus …. and nobody would say anything about it,” Bundy explained. ” You and I can sit anywhere in the bus. That’s what he wanted. That’s what I want. I want her to be able to sit anywhere in the bus and I want to be able to sit by her anywhere in that bus. That’s what he wanted. He didn’t want this prejudice thing like the media tried to put on me yesterday. I’m not going to put up with that because that’s not what he wanted. That’s not what I want.


See, it turns out that people who think that saying that blacks might have been better to stay salves and who thinks their problems stem from a lack of opportunities to pick cotton is a bit idiotic are the REAL racists, whereas Good ol' Clive is the true heir to the legacy of "Rosa Park"

I don't know if he's a racist or just a dumbass, but he definitely needs a primer on when to put down the shovel.
All Hail The Crimson King

User avatar
Nyarlathotep
Posts: 46428
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 2:50 pm
Has thanked: 698 times
Been thanked: 1156 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby Nyarlathotep » Fri Apr 25, 2014 7:57 pm

Abdul Alhazred wrote:
Anaxagoras wrote:They were enforcing a court order. That's "due process".


It is not due process, even if a court does it.

He was not convicted of a crime.


Are you being denied your property rights if you park your car on the side of the highway, never bother removing it after you get one of those little stickers on the window, and eventually it gets towed? Because that's pretty damned close to what happened here. He refused to remove his cattle from land that was not his and that he refused to pay for the right to grze his cattle on (you can argue that the government should now own so much of the grazing land, but either way that land was not the property of Cliven Bundy) and so the government impounded them.
All Hail The Crimson King

User avatar
hammegk
Posts: 15134
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 1:16 pm
Title: Curmudgeon
Location: Hither, sometimes Yon
Has thanked: 386 times
Been thanked: 28 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby hammegk » Sat Apr 26, 2014 2:00 am

Nyarlathotep wrote:
Abdul Alhazred wrote:
Anaxagoras wrote:They were enforcing a court order. That's "due process".


It is not due process, even if a court does it.

He was not convicted of a crime.


Are you being denied your property rights if you park your car on the side of the highway, never bother removing it after you get one of those little stickers on the window, and eventually it gets towed? Because that's pretty damned close to what happened here. He refused to remove his cattle from land that was not his and that he refused to pay for the right to grze his cattle on (you can argue that the government should now own so much of the grazing land, but either way that land was not the property of Cliven Bundy) and so the government impounded them.

It's called rustling.

User avatar
Doctor X
Posts: 64600
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 8:09 pm
Title: Collective Messiah
Location: Your Mom
Has thanked: 2798 times
Been thanked: 1762 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby Doctor X » Sat Apr 26, 2014 2:54 pm

I demand everyone support my demand to get something for nothing.

--J.D.
Mob of the Mean: Free beanie, cattle-prod and Charley Fan Club!
"Doctor X is just treating you the way he treats everyone--as subhuman crap too dumb to breathe in after you breathe out."--Don
DocX: FTW.--sparks
"Doctor X wins again."--Pyrrho
"It was the criticisms of Doc X, actually, that let me see more clearly how far the hypocrisy had gone."--clarsct
"I'd leave it up to Doctor X who has been a benevolent tyrant so far."--Grammatron
"Indeed you are a river to your people.

Shit. That's going to end up in your sig."--Pyrrho

ImageWS CHAMPIONS X3!!! NBA CHAMPIONS!! ImageStanley Cup!Image SB CHAMPIONS X5!!!!! Image

User avatar
sparks
Posts: 12251
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: Friar McWallclocks Bar -- Where time stands still while you lean over!
Has thanked: 1311 times
Been thanked: 387 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby sparks » Sat Apr 26, 2014 3:57 pm

Right Arm!!11Eleventy :dothewave: Down with the big.............erm..........................Whatever!!
Nice things? Hell no!

Board Crumbmuffin.

User avatar
corplinx
Posts: 19282
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 am
Title: Moderator
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 578 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby corplinx » Sat Apr 26, 2014 4:17 pm

Was the Bundy ranch the new Terry Schiavo moment for the fanatical right?

User avatar
gnome
Posts: 20812
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 12:40 am
Location: New Port Richey, FL
Has thanked: 278 times
Been thanked: 273 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby gnome » Sat Apr 26, 2014 8:20 pm

ed wrote:
gnome wrote:
ed wrote:
gnome wrote:If they really liked it the confrontation would have been the perfect excuse.


Ruby Ridge

I think that they rely on intimidation.


Then why didn't they go for it this time?


Ruby Ridge. Though Obama is oh so tone deaf, he is very sensitive to press treatment. There is no way the feds would have come out of a confrontation looking good.


That's contradictory... you can't rely on intimidation and avoid confrontation. Which is it that they want?
"If fighting is sure to result in victory, then you must fight! Sun Tzu said that, and I'd say he knows a little bit more about fighting than you do, pal, because he invented it, and then he perfected it so that no living man could best him in the ring of honor. Then, he used his fight money to buy two of every animal on earth, and then he herded them onto a boat, and then he beat the crap out of every single one. And from that day forward any time a bunch of animals are together in one place it's called a zoo! (Beat) Unless it's a farm!"
--Soldier, TF2

User avatar
Bruce
Posts: 19395
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 11:46 pm
Title: Big cynic in small state
Location: Rhode Island
Has thanked: 259 times
Been thanked: 394 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby Bruce » Sun Apr 27, 2014 2:31 am

Watched an episode of Colbert Report about this today.

Laughed out loud over how quickly Hannity withdrew his support when the racist remarks started flying.

Nearly shit my pants when Bundy's posse announced that they put the women on the front lines intentionally so that if there was any shooting, the Federal government would get bad press for shooting women. :o
Such potential!

User avatar
Anaxagoras
Posts: 19388
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan
Has thanked: 1144 times
Been thanked: 897 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby Anaxagoras » Sun Apr 27, 2014 9:34 am

Bruce wrote:Nearly shit my pants when Bundy's posse announced that they put the women on the front lines intentionally so that if there was any shooting, the Federal government would get bad press for shooting women. :o


Wait, I've heard of that tactic before. . . . Where was it?


Oh yeah:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_shield
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.
William Shakespeare

User avatar
jacks
Posts: 2352
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 10:55 am
Title: double dipshit
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: Right Wingers and the Bundy Ranch

Postby jacks » Sun Apr 27, 2014 12:45 pm

Bruce wrote:Watched an episode of Colbert Report about this today.

Laughed out loud over how quickly Hannity withdrew his support when the racist remarks started flying.

Nearly shit my pants when Bundy's posse announced that they put the women on the front lines intentionally so that if there was any shooting, the Federal government would get bad press for shooting women. :o


He's so funny, he must have recounted harry reid's racist comment,

"He [Reid] was wowed by Obama's oratorical gifts and believed that the country was ready to embrace a black presidential candidate, especially one such as Obama -- a 'light-skinned' African American 'with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one,' " Halperin and Heilemann say.


so funny.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/09/obama.reid/


Return to “Politics & Social Issues”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CCBot [Bot] and 0 guests