ed wrote:The cynical use of the word "Asian" is clear evidence of conspiracy. The perps are not "Asian". Not by any stretch. This demonstrates that the elites/establishment/media are engaging in spin. Together. That is conspiracy.
I've noticed that Brits have a different connotation of "Asian" than Americans do. To Americans "Asian" means east Asian, China, Japan, Korea, Vietnam etc. Apparently to Brits it means everyone east of Greece. Also it seems to me that "black" in the UK means everyone who isn't white. No one in the USA would call a Moroccan, for example, "black" but that seems the norm in the UK.
I suppose technically the middle east, India and Pakistan are in what we refer to as "Asia minor."
Be that as it may, the refusal to identify these "Asian grooming gangs©
as majority Pakistani or majority Islam is an obfuscation, IMHO.
I think it is most likely driven by the fear of (white UK folks) being labeled as (God forbid) "racist!"
Just maybe that's what may have happened to Tommy Robinson...but I digress.
We have to stop saying ‘Asian grooming gangs’
Last month, two decisions were made by IPSO, the body which regulates most of the British press, in relation to the use of the word ‘Asians’. A complaint against The Sunday Times was upheld. IPSO ruled that the paper had published an inaccurate headline when it claimed that ‘Asians make up 80 per cent of child groomers’. The Muslim Council of Britain’s Miqdaad Versi called for a correction to clarify that the 80 per cent referred specifically to grooming ‘gangs’, not all child groomers.
But who are we referring to when we use the word ‘Asians’? The other complaint sought to address this issue. It was lodged by Sikh, Hindu and Pakistani-Christian groups, concerned about the liberal use of the word ‘Asian’ in the Sunday Mirror’s investigation into child-grooming gangs in Telford. The Sunday Mirror exposed ‘epidemic’ levels of child sexual exploitation in the northern town, where it was suggested that up to 1,000 girls, some as young as 11, had been abused by Asian men.
Well corplinx, it does indeed look as if some Asian folks in the UK are pissed about that, and trying to do something.
But the term ‘Asian’ is far too broad and smears innocent communities, said the complainants. They added that many Asian girls had been targeted by grooming gangs, too. But IPSO rejected their complaint. The regulator ruled that it was not ‘inaccurate to say the men were “mainly Asian”’. Nor did it give a ‘significantly misleading impression’, it said. Presumably, the editors’ code would also consider it accurate to describe these men as ‘mammals’, ‘humans’ or even ‘sentient beings’.
Okay, so now we know where the accepted term ("Asian grooming gangs©
") came from...some fucking Bureaucrats. It figures.
Joking aside, the complainants were right. The media’s use of ‘Asian’ to describe grooming gangs not only masks the ethno-religious identity of the perpetrators – it also throws Sikhs, Hindus, Pakistani-Christians and every other Asian under the bus. Gangs of Indian, Japanese and Korean men are not rampaging across Britain’s towns and cities, sexually abusing underage white girls. The men doing so are predominantly of Pakistani-Muslim heritage.
There is a great deal of evidence to support this. A 2017 Quilliam report, which researched the cases of 58 grooming gangs since 2005, found that 84 per cent of grooming-gang members are (South) Asian and the majority were ‘of Pakistani origin, with Muslim heritage’. The report suggests this background influenced the crimes these men committed against mainly young, white girls. In 2012, Judge Gerald Clifton foreshadowed this finding when sentencing nine members of a Rochdale grooming gang. He said they had treated their victims as ‘worthless and beyond all respect’, partly because they were not of the offenders’ ‘community or religion’. Recently, a Rotherham grooming-gang survivor described how she was persecuted for being ‘a white slag’ because she was non-Muslim.
Ah and here we come to it.
Fuckin' Muslims just doing shit the Koran allows...against Kafirs!
Example: Islamic Sanctification of Rape and the Horror of Muslim Rape
In Islamic perspectives, Adil Rashid is a good, moral, devout Muslim and he was only following the Islamic cultural ethos, shaped by the divine Islamic teachings of raping kafir women. In the eyes of Islamic God, Kafir women are no better than lollipops, dropped on the ground for Muslim pick and lick. As will be shown, Adil Rashid understands the Quran well and has followed in the footsteps of Muhammad, who was a child molester, rapist, murderer, terrorist, torturer, slaver.
I guess old Adil had a "sexual emergency" or something...
Yes, a success, a flaming success....
Then Skank Of America could start in...