A Thought for the Day

[Doctor X]

Thank you for retiring Drew, don’t ever come back.

– Thomas Edward Brady, NFL Benchwarmer

– J.D.

[Pyrrho]

@MattFnWallace
“In your darkest hour” is a BS phrase. I like the dark. It’s quiet. Everybody leaves me alone. I need help in my brightest hour when my photo sensitivity is killing me and all these f*cking emails won’t stop coming. In my darkest hour I’m all good, thanks, go away.

[Doctor X]

Hey, in Midway we were in charge of the Japanese navy. No wonder we lost!

– Pat Morita (Rear Admiral Ryunosuke Kusaka), to his costars James Shigeta (Vice Admiral Chuichi Nagumo), Clyde Kusatsu (Commander Watanabe) on an elevator ride in 2005

– J.D.

[Hotarubi]

Why didn't the glass slipper disappear at midnight.

[Ben Trovado]

Why didn't the glass slipper disappear at midnight.

I have far more fundamental questions, like - why did he identify her by her shoe?

I mean, was he a foot fetishist? They met, they talked, they danced . . . WTH was he looking at?

And also, even in a small kingdom, there must have been dozens to hundreds of girls with the same shoe size. . . . .

I call shenanigans.

[Hotarubi]

I have far more fundamental questions, like - why did he identify her by her shoe?

Because it fitted. See below.

mean, was he a foot fetishist? They met, they talked, they danced . . . WTH was he looking at?

He was looking at her tits like any other guy and that was the only "souvenir" left behind. I'm assuming if she left her cacks behind she would have been a lot easier to sniff out.

And also, even in a small kingdom, there must have been dozens to hundreds of girls with the same shoe size. . . . .

Story says no.

I call shenanigans.

All those questions are nullified if there is no shoe. Why are you not addressing the core issue.

[Doctor X]

He could not check her tits?

Was his name "Prince Edward?"

– J.D.

[Ben Trovado]

And also, even in a small kingdom, there must have been dozens to hundreds of girls with the same shoe size. . . . .

Story says no.

I call shenanigans.

All those questions are nullified if there is no shoe. Why are you not addressing the core issue.

Well, if the above is the explanation on my question, then everything is clear for the shoe:

Why did she shoe stick around?

"Story says yes."

QED

[Hotarubi]

And also, even in a small kingdom, there must have been dozens to hundreds of girls with the same shoe size. . . . .

Story says no.

I call shenanigans.

All those questions are nullified if there is no shoe. Why are you not addressing the core issue.

Well, if the above is the explanation on my question, then everything is clear for the shoe:

Why did she shoe stick around?

"Story says yes."

QED

Evasion noted.

[Hotarubi]

He could not check her tits?

Was his name "Prince Edward?"

– J.D.

If it was Prince Andrew there'd be nothing to look at.

[Doctor X]

Now, now, Fergie was well-upholstered.

A few decades too old, but everyone is a critic.

– J.D.

[Hotarubi]

Now, now, Fergie was well-upholstered.
– J.D.

Too many pizzas.

[Doctor X]

I recall, way back when the two first got married which justified her getting a Madame Tussaud figure, press people were trying to "measure her bum" to quote one of the more sophisticated rags from the Street of Fleet.

– J.D.

[Ben Trovado]

And also, even in a small kingdom, there must have been dozens to hundreds of girls with the same shoe size. . . . .

Story says no.

I call shenanigans.

All those questions are nullified if there is no shoe. Why are you not addressing the core issue.

Well, if the above is the explanation on my question, then everything is clear for the shoe:

Why did she shoe stick around?

"Story says yes."

QED

Evasion noted.

If "the story says so" is good enough for you, it's good enough for me. I'm egalitarian like that.

What I really want to know is - glass ?! Seems impractical and painful.

Like, it combines her being a masochist with him being a foot fetishist.

[Hotarubi]

If "the story says so" is good enough for you, it's good enough for me. I'm egalitarian like that.

Not so. Because you added speculation on events as opposed to me reporting actual events.

"There must have been... "

There were not .The story reports that. You notrueskeptic.

Secondly, as the glass shoes were magicks they would have fitted the contours of Cinders' foot perfectly. How many people on the planet - let alone attending the odd ball here and there - have exactly the same shape, size and volume of foot material? And if you speculate again, you must provide the evidence by measuring the feet of everyone at the ball.

Not so clever now are you.

[Ben Trovado]

If "the story says so" is good enough for you, it's good enough for me. I'm egalitarian like that.

Not so. Because you added speculation on events as opposed to me reporting actual events.

"There must have been... "

There were not .The story reports that. You notrueskeptic.

Secondly, as the glass shoes were magicks they would have fitted the contours of Cinders' foot perfectly. How many people on the planet - let alone attending the odd ball here and there - have exactly the same shape, size and volume of foot material? And if you speculate again, you must provide the evidence by measuring the feet of everyone at the ball.

Not so clever now are you.

Magic enough to fit her foot perfectly, but yet fall off?

FAIL, Pseudoskepticalist !!!!111!eleventy!!

[Hotarubi]

If "the story says so" is good enough for you, it's good enough for me. I'm egalitarian like that.

Not so. Because you added speculation on events as opposed to me reporting actual events.

"There must have been... "

There were not .The story reports that. You notrueskeptic.

Secondly, as the glass shoes were magicks they would have fitted the contours of Cinders' foot perfectly. How many people on the planet - let alone attending the odd ball here and there - have exactly the same shape, size and volume of foot material? And if you speculate again, you must provide the evidence by measuring the feet of everyone at the ball.

Not so clever now are you.

Magic enough to fit her foot perfectly, but yet fall off?

FAIL, Pseudoskepticalist !!!!111!eleventy!!

She was running. Ever tried running in slippers?

Phailz!!!!1222

https://i.ibb.co/qpXgK6v/unnamed-67.gif

[Doctor X]

You imply that she did not put her best foot forward?

– J.D.

[Doctor X]

Fan: Do you think that kid [Actor who played Georgie – Ed.] is in therapy?"

Tim Curry: I hope so.

– J.D.

[Hotarubi]

You imply that she did not put her best foot forward?

– J.D.

I find it sandallous that you are trying to pump this discussion for weak puns.

[sparks]

To be fair, what else is there to do here? We haven't heard from several core contributors in quite some time. Banter has gone to seed. And Politics has been reduced to a frothy mouthed mess of right wing idiots slinging snot from their noses while whining about nothing.

And then there are their Moms.

Jeebus fucking christ.

[Doctor X]

You take a heel turn?

– J.D.

[sparks]

Not turning anywhere.

Either on or off my decadent high heel red fuck me pumps! :)

[Ben Trovado]

Ever tried running in slippers?

Why? What have you heard?

[robinson]

To be fair, what else is there to do here? We haven't heard from several core contributors in quite some time.

They might be dead

[Hotarubi]

Ever tried running in slippers?

Why? What have you heard?

The usual whisperings.

[Doctor X]

Pick up a copy of any law review that you see, and the first article is likely to be, you know, "The Influence of Immanuel Kant on Evidentiary Approaches in 18th-century Bulgaria," or something!

– Chief Justice John Roberts, June 25, 2011: Interview at Fourth
Circuit Court of Appeals Annual Conference: in which he laments the disconnect between academia and law practice

Law professor Orin S. Kerr subsequently took that statement as "Challenge ACCEPTED!" and published the same-titled article in Greenbag, though it was not the first in that issue.

Spoiler:

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS has drawn attention to the influence of Immanuel Kant on evidentiary approaches in 18th-century Bulgaria. No scholarship has analyzed Kant’s influence in that context. This Article fills the gap in the literature by exploring Kant’s influence on evidentiary approaches in 18th-century Bulgaria. It concludes that Kant’s influence, in all likelihood, was none.

Yet:

Spoiler:

This judgment has troubled me for years. Although I do not call into question Kerr’s meticulous historical research, I would propose the following Kantian thought experiment: What if Immanuel Kant had been an 18th-century Bulgarian law professor?

Some readers might object that my Kantian thought experiment is capricious or contrived. Be that as it may, thought experiments, especially improbable or outrageous ones, can be useful devices for detecting hidden anomalies and producing new or surprising insights.n any case, the leap of imagination required to conjure up an 18th-century Bulgarian Kant is no more implausible than a cat that is simultaneously dead and alive or a mischievous demon who manipulates microscopic molecules or an imaginary utility monster who gains an ungodly amount of pleasure from doing evil deeds.

F.E. Guerra-Pujol, "Kant on Evidence? A Hypothetical Reply to Kerr"

– J.D.

[Hotarubi]

Don't see what that has got to do with either shoes or pumpkins.

[Doctor X]

Don't see what that has got to do with either shoes or pumpkins.

You Kant?

– J.D.

[Hotarubi]

I'm a what?

[Doctor X]

– J.D.

[Pyrrho]

https://twitter.com/BeladonnaRogers/sta ... 2059020292

[Ben Trovado]

Ever tried running in slippers?

Why? What have you heard?

The usual whisperings.

Honest... I ran out of gas. I... I had a flat tire. I didn't have enough money for cab fare. My tux didn't come back from the cleaners. An old friend came in from out of town. Someone stole my car. There was an earthquake. A terrible flood. Locusts!

It wasn't my fault, I swear to God!

[Ben Trovado]

https://twitter.com/BeladonnaRogers/sta ... 2059020292

I prefer Deja-Moo.

That feeling you've heard this b***s*** before.

[Ben Trovado]

– J.D.

He's a national treasure.

[Hotarubi]

In Doctor Who, if the TARDIS travels back to a time that existed before it was built, how come it doesn't disappear?

Checkmate nerds.

[Pyrrho]

In Doctor Who, if the TARDIS travels back to a time that existed before it was built, how come it doesn't disappear?

Checkmate nerds.

https://i.imgur.com/a78iJwf.jpg

[Pyrrho]

“He said, ‘What are you doing in there?’ And I said, well I've been flying the airplane. He says, ‘You shouldn't be flying the airplane, I should be flying the airplane because I'm the man.’ He hit himself on the chest. And I said honey, if you were I'd have noticed. He left. I never saw him again.” - Millie Young, WASP 44-W-10

[Doctor X]

– J.D.

[Hotarubi]

If a "man is as honest as the day is long", does that mean he is more likely commit criminal acts in the winter.