Can Global Warming proponents formulate

We are the Borg.
robinson
Posts: 16849
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Sardonic asshole
Location: USA

Re: Can Global Warming proponents formulate

Post by robinson »

Just one more thing

The MIT study, which almost nobody knows about, falsified the basic global warming theory. That wasn’t the goal of course, but that’s what happened.

Please understand the MIT really smart scientists did not say there is no global warming, instead they proposed a new theory of how and why it’s happening. And it applies to this topic, they made falsifiable predictions.

For the scientific literate, it’s not long wave radiation that will cause global warming, it’s short wave. For the illiterate, that means it won’t be the tiny amount of far infrared that causes warming, but visible light.

Infrared (IR), which CO2 influences, can not cause global warming, and never has. It’s the changes in albedo that allows global warming. Visible light will be the driver of global climate change, but this occurs because of changes in the IR, but those changes don’t drive the climate, it’s the consequences of the very small changes from IR that cause the albedo change, which is what actually drives global climate change.

This is pure theory, which contains predictions.
robinson
Posts: 16849
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Sardonic asshole
Location: USA

Re: Can Global Warming proponents formulate

Post by robinson »

It would be nice if that was all there is to it. But there are at least 6 more major factors involved, and nobody is even close to modeling it all together. And then there is the really big one, general circulation, which along with clouds and vulcanism, makes it near impossible to predict what will happen.

Politicians and commies don’t like that level of uncertainty, neither does anyone trying to plan for future changes.