Amusing Science
-
- Posts: 35689
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm
-
- Posts: 35689
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm
-
- Posts: 20319
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
- Title: Je suis devenu Français
- Location: USA
-
- Posts: 30342
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
- Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan
-
- Posts: 35689
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm
Re: Amusing Science
https://www.vice.com/en/article/kb7eew/ ... 1364663309The Louder the Monkey, the Smaller Its Balls, Study Finds
Howler monkeys can be well-endowed in the voice box or the family jewels, but not both.
https://i.imgur.com/EmhbbHu.jpg
Howler monkeys are the loudest land animals on Earth, capable of bellowing at volumes of 140 decibels, which is on the level of gunshots or firecrackers. Not surprisingly, male howlers frequently use this power to advertise their sexual fitness, catcalling females with their ear-splitting roars.
But in a beautiful twist of expectations, scientists have now found that the louder the monkey's calls, the smaller the monkey's balls. A team based out of Cambridge University came to this conclusion by comparing the size of dozens of monkeys' testes with the hyoid bones located in their voice boxes, which revealed a negative correlation between decibel levels and testicular endowment.
"We found that males with larger hyoids, who can make lower-pitch vocalizations, have smaller testes and live in single-male groups with a harem of a few females," anthropologist Leslie Knapp, a senior author of the study, said in a statement. "Males with smaller hyoids live in multimale groups and have larger testes."
According to the team, this is the first evidence that there is a trade-off between vocal investment and sperm production, and it helps to explain why howler monkeys develop contrasting social structures.
The paper (five years ago): https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fu ... 15)01109-4
Any similarity with gun wielding, monster truck driving anthropoids would be pure coincidence.
-
- Posts: 35689
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm
-
- Posts: 20319
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
- Title: Je suis devenu Français
- Location: USA
-
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:45 pm
- Location: The island of Atlanta
Re: Amusing Science
No fools they, the boys keep the testes as far away from danger as possible. They may be able to re-grow the "dick arm" though.
-
- Posts: 35689
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm
Re: Amusing Science
Pah! You've seen nothing:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traumatic_insemination (article full of other creepy examples)Traumatic insemination
Traumatic insemination, also known as hypodermic insemination, is the mating practice in some species of invertebrates in which the male pierces the female's abdomen with his aedeagus and injects his sperm through the wound into her abdominal cavity (hemocoel).[1] The sperm diffuse through the female's hemolymph, reaching the ovaries and resulting in fertilization.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... _edit1.jpg
A male bed bug (Cimex lectularius) traumatically inseminates a female bed bug (top). The female's ventral exoskeleton is visibly cracked around the point of insemination.
https://io9.gizmodo.com/female-bugs-evo ... pe-5287491Female Bugs Evolved To Prevent Rape
Water striders are tiny bugs that skate over water. And they regularly engage in what scientists call "coercive mating," or forced sex. But the females of one water strider species resisted - by evolving very unusual sets of genitals.
Scientists in Korea, studying the mating habits of water striders, noticed that a particular species in that family of insect had a unique mating habit: courtship. Ordinarily, among water striders, the male of the species mounts the female violently, effectively pins her to him by grabbing her by the waist (thorax), overcomes her "resistance" and forcibly penetrates her. But in the water strider species Gerris gracilicornis, the females took evolution to the next level, developing genitals that it was impossible for the males to penetrate without the females' permission.
-
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:45 pm
- Location: The island of Atlanta
Re: Amusing Science
Dang, and all those years I would listen to Beethoven's "Scene by the Brook" by the Chattahoochee I was actually seeing rape. Thanks you bastard.
-
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:45 pm
- Location: The island of Atlanta
Re: Amusing Science
Sorry if that came off harsh, I really must use those smiley things.
Now about those deep deep deep sea fish whose boys (plural) become organs of the Matriarchs body.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglerfish
Oh and yeah the above was a round about way of wishing LvB a happy 250th.
Now about those deep deep deep sea fish whose boys (plural) become organs of the Matriarchs body.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglerfish
Oh and yeah the above was a round about way of wishing LvB a happy 250th.
-
- Posts: 30342
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
- Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan
Re: Amusing Science
Which way is forward for an octopus? Are they facing each other or away from each other?
-
- Posts: 35689
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm
Re: Amusing Science
Forward is where the eyes are. Here you can see an octopus facing a threat (the diver), then fleeing backwards at the end, using its siphon as a rocket propulsor:
-
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:45 pm
- Location: The island of Atlanta
Re: Amusing Science
Poor little guy wtf was he (yeah, all animals are assumed to be male) doing in such a naked fucking desert.
If he was in search of red-haired wimmins it would be understandable .
If he was in search of red-haired wimmins it would be understandable .
-
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2020 4:02 pm
- Title: I can’t be worrying about that
-
- Posts: 35689
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm
-
- Posts: 30342
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
- Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan
-
- Posts: 7409
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 12:16 pm
- Title: inbred shit-for-brains
- Location: Planet X
-
- Posts: 35689
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm
-
- Posts: 35689
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm
-
- Posts: 20855
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 11:46 pm
- Title: Bruce of all Bruces
- Location: Massachusetts
-
- Posts: 35689
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm
Re: Amusing Science
You're referring to this myth, I presume: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menstrual_synchrony. :mrgreen:
Some points on phylogeny, the difficulties with microbes, and nice pics (skip the blather till 0:20 and after 9:20):
-
- Posts: 30342
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
- Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan
-
- Posts: 42480
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:52 pm
- Title: That Firebrand
Re: Amusing Science
[quote=Witness post_id=1049974 time=1609380554
[/quote]
I wondered about that. The methodology issue seems real. They did not seem to stratify on the basis of age or sexual activity or travel or a host of other things. All in all it the sloppy research that you would expect from a bunch of chicks.
Sad.
[/quote]
I wondered about that. The methodology issue seems real. They did not seem to stratify on the basis of age or sexual activity or travel or a host of other things. All in all it the sloppy research that you would expect from a bunch of chicks.
Sad.
-
- Posts: 30342
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
- Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan
Re: Amusing Science
As you know, radar uses radio waves, which are much longer in wavelength than visible light. The advantage of this is that it works well at night and can see through clouds, which optical telescopes can't do. The disadvantage is lower resolution, but they have a lot of neat tricks to improve the effective resolution.
-
- Posts: 30342
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
- Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan
-
- Posts: 20319
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
- Title: Je suis devenu Français
- Location: USA
-
- Posts: 35689
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm
-
- Posts: 35689
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm
Re: Amusing Science
Nuke your favorite place (something for sparks :twisted: ): https://outrider.org/nuclear-weapons/in ... g=2.320582
-
- Posts: 35689
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm
Re: Amusing Science
https://fee.org/articles/new-study-mili ... uce-crime/New Study: Militarizing the Police Doesn’t Reduce Crime
A federal program created by Congress more than 30 years ago transferred 80,000 rifles, 12,000 bayonets, 4,000 combat knives, nearly 500 ‘bomb detonator robots,’ 50 airplanes, ‘night-vision sniper scopes,’ and more to local police.
Most Americans are probably unaware that police departments across the country have access to grenade launchers, drones, armored vehicles, and other military-grade equipment. But they do, thanks to an obscure federal policy allowing the military to transfer surplus equipment to law enforcement.
New research casts doubt on the principal justification for this program: police safety and crime reduction. Meanwhile, critics say it makes police abuse more likely.
The policy itself is known as the “1033 Program.” First created by Congress more than 30 years ago, it allowed for the transfer of military equipment to the police for use in the War on Drugs. Eventually, lawmakers expanded the policy to encompass essentially all law enforcement purposes.
According to the Department of Defense, roughly 8,200 law enforcement agencies across the country participate in the program. In total, the military has transferred more than $7.4 billion worth of equipment to local police departments.
...
In sum, there’s no disputing the fact that our policies have militarized the police. The only debate is whether giving police officers, who undoubtedly have a dangerous job, military equipment actually improves public safety as proponents insist.
A new peer-reviewed study concludes this just isn’t so.
Researchers from Louisiana State University and Emory University examined data from the 1033 Program’s record and found no evidence that it reduced crime in any meaningful way. It debunks past studies that purported to show such an effect and explains why those data were faulty.
“The most important thing for policy makers and the public to know is that you can’t justify giving surplus military equipment to police departments on the grounds it will lead to a reduction in crime,” Emory Professor Tom Clark said. “There is no evidence for that.”
Not only is there ample evidence that this kind of equipment fails to protect public safety, there’s further proof that it fails to protect police officers. According to a study of 9,000 law enforcement agencies in the US, this equipment has had no bearing on the number of officers killed or harmed in the line of duty.
Most concerning of all, other evidence shows that the militarization of police has led to worsening relationships between citizens and officers. It has caused a change in the mentality of how police view the citizens they serve and led to an increased use of weapons of war against Americans.
-
- Posts: 30342
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
- Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan
-
- Posts: 35689
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm
-
- Posts: 35689
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm
-
- Posts: 35689
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm
Re: Amusing Science
https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/20 ... t-so-great for the rest (and the "not so great" part).We Drink Basically The Same Wine Varietals As Ancient Romans, And That's Not So Great
https://i.imgur.com/a1CjID3.jpg
With wine, older can often mean better. "Vintage," our word for "classily aged," comes from the winemaking process. Wines from decades ago can fetch far higher prices than freshly made ones. Wine itself is woven throughout ancient history, from ancient Judeo-Christian rites (hello, Last Supper!) to Egyptian ceremonies to Roman orgies. And the grape varieties we like tend to have lengthy pasts: For instance, chardonnay grapes from France's Champagne region have been made into white wine since the Middle Ages.
But until now, nobody knew just how ancient the wine varietals we've been drinking are. According to a new study in Nature Plants published Monday, many of the most popular wine varietals sold today are extremely genetically similar to the wines that ancient Romans drank — and may have existed for thousands of years longer.
To determine the genetic lineages of the wines they studied, researchers collected 28 grape seeds from nine ancient archaeological sites in France. There's evidence the seeds date back 2,500 years. They then analyzed the grapes' genes and compared them with modern grape varieties — something that hadn't been done before and required a cross-disciplinary effort by ancient-DNA researchers, archaeologists and modern-grape geneticists.
Of the 28 ancient seeds that the researchers tested, all were genetically related to grapes grown today. Sixteen of the 28 were within one or two generations of modern varieties. And in at least one case, the researchers found evidence that consumers are drinking wine from the same grapes, or a direct relative, as medieval Frenchmen 900 years ago: the rare savagnin blanc (not to be confused with sauvignon), a light, floral white varietal with rigorous growing standards and a small range of cultivation in eastern France.
In other cases — for example, with pinot noir and syrah grapes — we are using grapes that are genetic relatives of those used to make wine during the Roman Empire.
Pedantic note: savagnin is used to make Jura's famous vin jaune ("yellow wine") and has a very peculiar, and delicious, taste. But then I'm always astonished how diverse wines can be, it's just grape juice after all. :P
-
- Posts: 23535
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 7:15 pm
- Title: Incipient toppler
- Location: Swimming in Lake Ed
Re: Amusing Science
Contrary to the label, 'Murican wine that never even met a grape
https://i.imgur.com/fEuMotY.png
-
- Posts: 35689
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm
-
- Posts: 35689
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:50 pm