Trolley problem

Stump your fellow simians.
Pyrrho
Posts: 31994
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 2:17 am
Title: Man in Black
Location: Division 6

Trolley problem

Post by Pyrrho »

Link:

Nyarlathotep
Posts: 49714
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 2:50 pm

Re: Trolley problem

Post by Nyarlathotep »

The Trolley Problem has a very clear solution

gnome
Posts: 25954
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 12:40 am
Location: New Port Richey, FL

Re: Trolley problem

Post by gnome »

Variations on this one eat at me a bit. In the "switch" version I would direct the train towards the fewer number of people with little hesitation. In the "push" version I would probably not push someone into the way. Though, the result is identical, and I have exactly as much control over the outcome in both cases.

I've really no idea why the distinction is so important to me. For now I just take it as a deconstruction of pure utilitarianism.
gnome
Posts: 25954
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 12:40 am
Location: New Port Richey, FL

Re: Trolley problem

Post by gnome »

Oh yes--there's room for a MASSIVE false dichotomy. Outside of theoretical scenarios I'm sure it is difficult to be certain that there are no other options, or that any of the proposed options will work out as expected. I'm sure that's why a train is used--there's an image of inevitability that already puts the brain towards thinking inside the box.
gnome
Posts: 25954
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 12:40 am
Location: New Port Richey, FL

Re: Trolley problem

Post by gnome »

Possibly the "prime directive" of any attempt to apply game theory to real-life scenarios is to look for the exploit, or even a cheat. RL has those, possibly more often than games. There are unmodeled factors.
ceptimus
Posts: 1441
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 11:04 pm
Location: UK

Re: Trolley problem

Post by ceptimus »

gnome wrote: Sun May 05, 2019 3:51 am I've really no idea why the distinction is so important to me. For now I just take it as a deconstruction of pure utilitarianism.
Throwing the switch, you only commit the minor crime of interfering with the property of the trolley company - and everyone would let you off because you save lives. Pushing the person under the trolley, you commit murder, and even though you still save lives, you're most likely to be subject to a lengthy and stressful trial at the very least.
Rob Lister
Posts: 23535
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 7:15 pm
Title: Incipient toppler
Location: Swimming in Lake Ed

Re: Trolley problem

Post by Rob Lister »

gnome wrote: Sun May 05, 2019 3:51 am Variations on this one eat at me a bit. In the "switch" version I would direct the train towards the fewer number of people with little hesitation. In the "push" version I would probably not push someone into the way. Though, the result is identical, and I have exactly as much control over the outcome in both cases.

I've really no idea why the distinction is so important to me. For now I just take it as a deconstruction of pure utilitarianism.
You are the epitome of Chidi Anagonye in The Good Place.
gnome
Posts: 25954
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 12:40 am
Location: New Port Richey, FL

Re: Trolley problem

Post by gnome »

My wife would probably appreciate it if I had his abs.

But maybe I am a little, only actually capable of making a decision.

So am I the white equivalent of the black guy with no "soul"?



0:38
gnome
Posts: 25954
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 12:40 am
Location: New Port Richey, FL

Re: Trolley problem

Post by gnome »

There's that imperative to find a reality-based loophole. Within the purely philosophical construct, that's a cheat though, as much as announcing that you'll put a crash-proof shield on the victims--making assumptions beyond the premise.
Pyrrho
Posts: 31994
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 2:17 am
Title: Man in Black
Location: Division 6

Re: Trolley problem

Post by Pyrrho »

Link:

gnome
Posts: 25954
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 12:40 am
Location: New Port Richey, FL

Re: Trolley problem

Post by gnome »

ceptimus wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2019 2:30 am
gnome wrote: Sun May 05, 2019 3:51 am I've really no idea why the distinction is so important to me. For now I just take it as a deconstruction of pure utilitarianism.
Throwing the switch, you only commit the minor crime of interfering with the property of the trolley company - and everyone would let you off because you save lives. Pushing the person under the trolley, you commit murder, and even though you still save lives, you're most likely to be subject to a lengthy and stressful trial at the very least.
And yet, if I were promised immunity from prosecution or other consequences to myself, I would still struggle over the decision. So I don't think that's it.
ceptimus
Posts: 1441
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 11:04 pm
Location: UK

Re: Trolley problem

Post by ceptimus »

Maybe the recurring nightmares about the guy you pushed would haunt you - whereas by doing nothing you can look the other way as the carnage ensues, and think, "I had nothing to do with it." Probably best if you get away from the trolley track before the impact occurs - perhaps there is a little coffee shop you can slip into.
Anaxagoras
Posts: 29660
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan

Re: Trolley problem

Post by Anaxagoras »



This is kinda cool actually.

A psychological study on real live unsuspecting victims placed in the position of playing God.
Pyrrho
Posts: 31994
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 2:17 am
Title: Man in Black
Location: Division 6

Re: Trolley problem

Post by Pyrrho »

https://i.imgur.com/I7GogBY.jpg
Pyrrho
Posts: 31994
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 2:17 am
Title: Man in Black
Location: Division 6

Re: Trolley problem

Post by Pyrrho »

https://i.imgur.com/4gXMmS2.jpg
shemp
Posts: 7215
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 12:16 pm
Title: inbred shit-for-brains
Location: Planet X

Re: Trolley problem

Post by shemp »