Wuhan Flu Truth and Big Brother Narratives

We are the Borg.
Anaxagoras
Posts: 30276
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan

Re: Wuhan Flu Truth and Big Brother Narratives

Post by Anaxagoras »

Pyrrho wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 11:03 am https://www.reuters.com/business/health ... 022-01-31/
Japanese trading and pharmaceuticals company Kowa Co Ltd (7807.T) on Monday said that anti-parasite drug ivermectin showed an "antiviral effect" against Omicron and other coronavirus variants in joint non-clinical research.

The company, which has been working with Tokyo's Kitasato University on testing the drug as a potential treatment for COVID-19, did not provide further details.
https://twitter.com/ariehkovler/status/ ... 9284837381

The press release apparently is about in vitro non-clinical research that is completely separate from Kowa's ongoing Phase III Clinical trials in human subjects.
Here's the follow-up:

Kowa says ivermectin not effective in treating COVID-19
A clinical trial was unable to prove the efficacy of the antiparasitic medicine ivermectin against coronavirus variants, according to Japanese drugmaker Kowa Co., which has indicated that it will no longer seek approval for the drug as a COVID-19 treatment.

The Nagoya-based pharmaceutical and trading company announced the results of a randomized, double-blind, international clinical trial on Sept. 26. In the trial, 1,030 patients with mild COVID-19 were orally administered the drug daily for three days and then compared to others given a placebo.

Ivermectin was found to be safe and few people given the drug developed severe symptoms, Kowa said. But both the group given the drug and the one administered a placebo saw improvements in symptoms, meaning the trial did not show the drug’s efficacy over the placebo as a COVID-19 treatment.
Kitasato University has concurred:
Ivermectin Fails in Investigator-Led COVID Trial Too
Kitasato University Hospital said on September 30 that the antiparasitic agent ivermectin could not yield a statistically significant difference against placebo in the primary endpoint in an investigator-initiated trial for the treatment of COVID-19.
Pyrrho
Posts: 33833
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 2:17 am
Title: Man in Black
Location: Division 6

Re: Wuhan Flu Truth and Big Brother Narratives

Post by Pyrrho »

...aannnddd the anti-vaxxers and "it's just a cold" Illuminati are having a field day because, apparently, a Pfizer executive said to Congress something regarding the vaccine not having been tested for prevention of transmission of the virus. I haven't the time right now to review the available data from the FDA approval process and I don't know exactly what was said or in what context. But I am sure that people much smarter than I am will tell me.
Doctor X
Posts: 79487
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 8:09 pm
Title: Collective Messiah
Location: Your Mom

Re: Wuhan Flu Truth and Big Brother Narratives

Post by Doctor X »

IT MEANS DUCTH PROVE BIG PHAMRA TEST UNBORN BABIES ON OUR CHIDLRENS AND MORE CHILRENS DIES OF BIG PHARMA THAN VIRYS U CANT EVEN SMELL!

The more serious, possible, legal, point is that if "prevent transmission," was the basis of enforcing vaccination, then that might be a legal problem. Of course, all of that qualification and what the law, anywhere, will actually do is not even the same game.

– J.D.
Pyrrho
Posts: 33833
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 2:17 am
Title: Man in Black
Location: Division 6

Re: Wuhan Flu Truth and Big Brother Narratives

Post by Pyrrho »

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-p ... 0413863226
While Roos and many others framed this as a new revelation, Pfizer never claimed that its clinical trial, upon which the vaccine was authorized for use, evaluated the shot’s effect on transmission. In fact, shortly before the vaccine’s release, the company’s CEO emphasized that this was still being evaluated.

A study funded by Pfizer and German vaccine maker BioNTech published in the New England Journal of Medicine on Dec. 10, 2020, a day before the Food and Drug Administration gave Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine emergency use authorization, did not include data about the vaccine’s effectiveness at reducing transmission of the virus.

Instead, it reported that two doses of the vaccine provided 95% protection against contracting symptomatic COVID-19 in people 16 and older. Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla also said in a December 2020 interview with NBC News that it was still unclear whether vaccinated individuals could carry the virus and transmit it to others.

“I think this is something that needs to be examined,” he told the network. “We are not certain about that right now.”
<insert something bla bla etc.>

Back to my box and whisker plots.
Pyrrho
Posts: 33833
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 2:17 am
Title: Man in Black
Location: Division 6

Re: Wuhan Flu Truth and Big Brother Narratives

Post by Pyrrho »

https://www.scientificamerican.com/arti ... ccination/
Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 lowers the risk of long COVID after infection by only about 15%, according to a study of more than 13 million people1. That’s the largest cohort that has yet been used to examine how much vaccines protect against the condition, but it is unlikely to end the uncertainty.
Pyrrho
Posts: 33833
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 2:17 am
Title: Man in Black
Location: Division 6

Re: Wuhan Flu Truth and Big Brother Narratives

Post by Pyrrho »

Twit: https://twitter.com/amymaxmen/status/1581975377337274369
robinson
Posts: 20111
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Je suis devenu Français
Location: USA

Re: Wuhan Flu Truth and Big Brother Narratives

Post by robinson »

ceptimus wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2020 11:17 pm If there are lots of people who've had it and recovered that we don't know about, then that's good news for the death ratio, but it's bad news for the transmission ratio because that means it's spreading much faster than official figures show.
You were correct
Pyrrho
Posts: 33833
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 2:17 am
Title: Man in Black
Location: Division 6

Re: Wuhan Flu Truth and Big Brother Narratives

Post by Pyrrho »

https://www.statnews.com/2022/10/17/bos ... -scrutiny/
Research at Boston University that involved testing a lab-made hybrid version of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is garnering heated headlines alleging the scientists involved could have unleashed a new pathogen.

There is no evidence the work, performed under biosecurity level 3 precautions in BU’s National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories, was conducted improperly or unsafely. In fact, it was approved by an internal biosafety review committee and Boston’s Public Health Commission, the university said Monday night.

But it has become apparent that the research team did not clear the work with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which was one of the funders of the project. The agency indicated it is going to be looking for some answers as to why it first learned of the work through media reports.
:ni:
robinson
Posts: 20111
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Je suis devenu Français
Location: USA

Re: Wuhan Flu Truth and Big Brother Narratives

Post by robinson »

Big Brother - “Trust me, no engineered virus ever escaped from a lab.”


(Except for those two times SARS did)
robinson
Posts: 20111
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Je suis devenu Français
Location: USA

Re: Wuhan Flu Truth and Big Brother Narratives

Post by robinson »

https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com ... 0040427-03

https://www.the-scientist.com/news-anal ... wice-50137
robinson
Posts: 20111
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Je suis devenu Français
Location: USA

Re: Wuhan Flu Truth and Big Brother Narratives

Post by robinson »

“Yeah but except for those two times, we have been very very careful”

Yeah, sure. And of course you KNEW it was a deadly virus, because you created it. But sure, we trust you. I mean, if you created some deadly virus and it escaped the whole world might get infected and millions would die. Fascist might use the virus to destroy freedoms and fuck everything up … so I’m sure it can’t ever happen






Again
Pyrrho
Posts: 33833
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 2:17 am
Title: Man in Black
Location: Division 6

Re: Wuhan Flu Truth and Big Brother Narratives

Post by Pyrrho »

https://i.imgur.com/JaG66Y9.jpg
Anaxagoras
Posts: 30276
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan

Re: Wuhan Flu Truth and Big Brother Narratives

Post by Anaxagoras »

Effect of Ivermectin vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients With Mild to Moderate COVID-19
Findings In this double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled platform trial conducted in the US during a period of Delta and Omicron variant predominance, and that included 1591 adult outpatients with COVID-19, the posterior probability of improvement in time to recovery in those treated with ivermectin vs placebo had a hazard ratio of 1.07, with a posterior probability of benefit of .91. This did not meet the prespecified threshold of posterior probability greater than .95.

Meaning These findings do not support the use of ivermectin in outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19.
Doctor X
Posts: 79487
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 8:09 pm
Title: Collective Messiah
Location: Your Mom

Re: Wuhan Flu Truth and Big Brother Narratives

Post by Doctor X »

Anaxagoras wrote: Tue Oct 25, 2022 4:45 am
https://i.imgur.com/6HeatvL.gif

– J.D.
Pyrrho
Posts: 33833
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 2:17 am
Title: Man in Black
Location: Division 6

Re: Wuhan Flu Truth and Big Brother Narratives

Post by Pyrrho »

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/20 ... -outbreak/

A coronavirus outbreak on the verge of being China’s biggest of the pandemic has exposed a critical flaw in Beijing’s “zero covid” strategy: a vast population without natural immunity. After months with only occasional hot spots in the country, most of its 1.4 billion people have never been exposed to the virus.


Chinese authorities, who on Friday reported nearly 33,000 infections, are scrambling to protect the most vulnerable populations. They have launched a more aggressive vaccine drive to boost immunity, expanded hospital capacity and started to restrict the movement of at-risk groups. The elderly, who have an especially low vaccination rate, are a key target.

These efforts, which stop short of approving foreign vaccines, are an attempt to keep the virus from overwhelming a health-care system ill-prepared for a flood of very sick covid patients.
robinson
Posts: 20111
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:01 am
Title: Je suis devenu Français
Location: USA

Re: Wuhan Flu Truth and Big Brother Narratives

Post by robinson »

They should just use western style vaccines. They certainly stop the spread of Covid